; Mahar, A.L. Conclusions : Les deux mesures de l'IFMS montrent une fiabilit et une validit acceptables. The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI. Disclaimer. 0000084264 00000 n 0000076125 00000 n Pajares B, Roldn-Jimnez C, Alba E, Cuesta-Vargas AI. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted Coster, S.; Poole, K.; Fallowfield, L.J. The demographic and frequency of diagnosis of the study sample are detailed in Table1. 0000081478 00000 n Mthodes : Les adultes ayant une dysfonction des membres suprieurs (MS) ont rpondu au questionnaire IFMS-20, aux questionnaires de l'chelle fonctionnelle des membres suprieurs (EFMS), de l'chelle de limitation de la douleur et de l'chelle de l'intensit de la douleur au cours de leurs premires valuations en physiothrapie (moment 1); de 24 48 heures plus tard (moment 2) et 3 semaines aprs le dbut du traitement ou le cong, selon l'chance la plus rapproche (moment 3). The one-factor solution that emerged in the factor analysis accounted for 60.54% of the total variance. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) [32] which is criticized due to it development methodology using a specific workers population in a small data set with a high average age [6, 8]. Psychometric properties were evaluated following Costello and Osborne [, Although previous PROs have been validated in BCS [, In the present study, the KMO showed that the ULFI was suitable for an EFA analysis. %%EOF Int Orthop 2008,32(4):497504. The EQ-5D-3L has been demonstrated as valid and reliable in the Spanish population [42]. 0000076204 00000 n Results: Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. ; Aouizerat, B.E. Methods: A two stage observational study was conducted. 2015 Jul-Sep;28(3):279-84; quiz 285. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.001. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Am J Occup Ther 2011,65(2):169178. 0000098017 00000 n Harrington, S.; Michener, L.A.; Kendig, T.; Miale, S.; George, S.Z. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. Today, do you or would you have any difficulty at all with: Today, do you or would you have any difficulty at all with: Upper Extremity Functional Scale . The QuickDASH, as derived from 11extracted DASH items, has also been challenged. 0000005162 00000 n 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.024, Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC: Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Med Care 45(5):S3-S11. Psychometric Development of the Upper Limb Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire Demonstrated the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Be a Robust Measure for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema. 0000153258 00000 n Google Scholar, Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, Group UEC: Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. 0000156160 00000 n The purpose of this study was the adaptation and validation of a Spanish-version (SFI-Sp) with cultural and linguistic equivalence. Les valeurs du CDM se sont tablies 9,4/80 pour le questionnaire IFMS-20 et 8,8/100 pour le questionnaire IFMS-15. Demographics, including working status, were obtained at Time 1. 0.95 in a sample of upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions,1 and ICC 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.92) in a sample with shoulder, elbow, wrist and forearm musculoskeletal conditions. 0000153822 00000 n << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> Modification of the Upper Limb Functional Index to a Three-Point Response Improves Clinimetric Properties. The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has been validated across different populations and languages. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the The total score was accounted for, not the individual questionnaire response items. The criterion validity demonstrated only a fair degree of differential association with the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L-VAS. Longitudinal validity was determined by the association (Pearson's r) between function and pain change scores (Time 1-Time 3). Wiley: Chichester; 2000. 6: 4997. 10.1016/j.math.2008.01.013, Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Brigatti E: Psychometric properties of QuickDASH - A classical test theory and Rasch analysis study. The items are arranged from most to least difficult, top to bottom. 0000073196 00000 n 0000155991 00000 n The ULFI-Sp demonstrated high internal consistency (=0.94) and reliability (r=0.93). WHO | Breast Cancer: Prevention and Control. 0000156641 00000 n The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group During its First Two Years. The Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS) [30] which has been shown to lack reliability and methodological criteria [5, 31]. Terwee, C.B. Their presenting conditions and diagnoses were broadly classified into five categories (Table1). https://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php?title=Upper_Extremity_Functional_Index&oldid=259397, Any of your usual work, housework, or school activities, Your usual hobbies, recreational or sporting activities, Lifting a bag of groceries to waist level, Lifting a bag of groceries above your head, Pushing up on your hands (eg, from bathtub or chair), Laundering clothes (eg, washing, ironing, folding), Carrying a small suitcase with your affected limb. An official website of the United States government. most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal. The ULFI has also been accepted by the international PRO database [39] PROQUOLID. ; Dekker, J.; Bouter, L.M. Roldn-Jimnez C, Cuadros-Romero M, Bennett P, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Google Scholar, Morris LA, Miller DW: The regulation of Patient-Reported Outcome claims: need for a flexible standard. xZKs6WVS &$C(Ee~.NCVx]Qez;Wlfax@ofw3#J-3&dj56X\>2J@VG9!NyJ_f0M?ck4aN03kYI%/lQ k$Rv\p ,ZAxKa[:SV[TK3imT/MG~(|Z7-%2.H;YSZ, ; +%Hj4]?|5p}H$qEd_R g#mNxJ[8-u1G^.fog(o Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersGummesson (2006) . The regulation of Patient-Reported Outcome claims: need for a flexible standard. The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). J. Environ. J Hand Ther 2006,19(3):328349. J Hand Ther 2009,22(3):221236. It has been subsequently independently validated [33] but uses a matrix response format which has a high error tendency for completion and scoring [34]. ; Osborne, J.W. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. ; Yelland, M.; Melloh, M.; Burkett, B. On a calcul le rsultat du questionnaire IFMS-15 partir de questions pertinentes contenues dans la version IFMS-20. Criterion validity determined from the relationship between the ULFI-Sp and EQ-5D-3L (r=0.59) and EQ-5D-3L-VAS (r=0.51) indicated a fair and inverse correlation. ; Dunn, L.; Elboim, C.; Schmidt, B.; Hamolsky, D.; Levine, J.D. Therefore the aims of this paper were: to describe the process of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original ULFI to Spanish; and to subsequently assess the four critical psychometric properties of reliability, factor structure, internal consistency, and concurrent criterion validity for clinical use with Spanish speakers. Both ULFI-Sp models had RMSEA values 0.08, indicating acceptable fit [, The SPADI questionnaire of 13 items was also reduced and translated into Spanish with ten items [, A QuickDASH version of 11 items was validated in BCS. 0000102640 00000 n ; Naume, B.; Dahl, A.A. Kwans Arm Problem Scale: Psychometric Examination in a Sample of Stage II Breast Cancer Survivors. ; Amadio, P.C. Clinicians may assess the upper limbs after breast cancer. Implementation of a Standard Care Program of Therapeutic Exercise in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients. ; Rye, S.A.; DiSipio, T.; Hayes, S.C. ; Knol, D.L. A further consideration was that the ULFI has a single factor structure [25] and an acceptable level of internal consistency in all studies. The present study has several limitations. Google Scholar, Smith MV, Calfee RP, Baumgarten KM, Brophy RH, Wright RWJ: Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. Flowchart of the translation of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) from English to Spanish. 0000075099 00000 n National Library of Medicine Their presenting conditions were representative of the five categories of the full sample and expressed with a 95% CI using scores on the ULFI-Sp from the participants at baseline and on repetition at day seven. Clinicians may assess the upper limbs after breast cancer. Health outcome assessment is an important component of patient care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009,90(1):151169. The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has been validated across different populations and languages. 10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181ae974d, Fayad F, Mace Y, Lefevre-Colau MM, Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Revel M: Measurement of shoulder disability in the athlete: a systematic review [In French]. , are consistently defined [6, 7, 26, 38]. The upper extremity postthrombotic syndrome score: an international Delphi consensus study to determine the score's functional disability component. -. A Rasch-validated version of the upper extremity functional index for interval-level measurement of upper extremity function. 10.5014/ajot.2011.000794, Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G: Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study. 0000095718 00000 n Background: The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. Arooj, A.; Amjad, F.; Tanveer, F.; Arslan, A.U. 0000080372 00000 n 0000070007 00000 n ; Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M.W.G.N. However, over the last two decades region specific PROs that represent the three key body regions, of the upper limb, lower limb and spine have been used more frequently in the assessment of a musculoskeletal patients functional status [5]. The inability to use the QuickDASH-Sp data collected in the clinical setting due to excessive missing responses, potentially from patient burden due to being the final questionnaire, resulted in no direct comparison with a regional upper limb criterion, a requirement for future studies. ; Li, Q.; Sussman, J.; Moody, L.; Barbera, L.; Holloway, C.M. The 15-item was developed to fit the Rasch analysis and it has been recommended because it's unidimensional. Sensors (Basel). 10.1007/s00264-007-0344-7, Article 0000075968 00000 n Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Greek Version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index. ; Bartlett, M.S. 0000139515 00000 n The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). 0000157514 00000 n The translation process ensured the conceptual equivalence of the used terms. No special 2018 Clinical Breast Cancer, Vol. Occup Environ Med 2002,59(10):664670. Inclusion criteria were an upper limb injury as diagnosed by the attending medical practitioner. Treatment Related Impairments in Arm and Shoulder in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Hudak, P.L. Intended Population The UEFI is intended for use in individuals with upper extremity (including the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand) dysfunction of musculoskeletal origin. Phys Ther 2012,92(1):98110. The UEFI-15 was calculated from relevant items in the UEFI-20. ; Bubis, L.D. ; Rapport, F.; Russell, I.T. Bookshelf The MDC Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI. This provided accessibility to the ULFI for the second largest geographically used language. 0000071356 00000 n 10.2310/6640.2004.15377. Authors are grateful to the volunteers for their participation. FOIA Methods: A psychometric validation study of the ULFI-Sp was conducted on 216 voluntary breast cancer survivors. 2019). This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Upper Limb Functional Index Spanish version (ULFI-Sp) in the BCS. 0000071017 00000 n Med Care. Descriptive analyses were applied to calculate means and standard deviations of demographic variables (Table1). stream Check out the 12 tools and questionnaires you should use to assess the upper limb in neurorehabilitation such as . 10.2522/ptj.20100199, Lehman LA, Sindhu BS, Shechtman O, Romero S, Velozo CA: A comparison of the abiity of two upper extremity assessments to measure change in function. ; Coburn, N.G. 0000155188 00000 n Scoring and interpretation of scores ;*0VH'I`\"e``bd A2e9kt9%SGS eX Purpose: To examine the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the 20-item version and the Rasch-refined 15-item version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI-20 and UEFI-15, respectively) and to determine the impact of arm dominance on the positive minimal clinically important difference (pMCID). Bookshelf Responsiveness of the Arabic Upper Extremity Functional Index in Patients with Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. <]/Prev 380003>> The scale is in logits. By using this website, you agree to our HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help The cross-cultural adaptation of the ULFI into Spanish enables clinicians in Spanish speaking settings to compare outcomes following their treatments and interventions affecting the upper limb. Bravini, E.; Franchignoni, F.; Giordano, A.; Sartorio, F.; Ferriero, G.; Vercelli, S.; Foti, C. Classical Test Theory and Rasch Analysis Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index in Subjects with Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders. 0000157714 00000 n ; Bruce, B.; Rose, M.; et al. permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. The factor analysis revealed a satisfactory percentage of total variance explained by the one factor at 48.9%. Le bras dominant a un effet sur la pDMCI. In the same study, the longitudinal validity coefficient between the UEFI and the UEFS was 0.74. Patient-Reported Upper Extremity Outcome Measures Used in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Physiopedia is not a substitute for professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider. 0000156965 00000 n Karanasios S, Kampourakis G, Ntoulaveris I, Kouvaras K, Lignos I, Diamantopoulos N, Gioftsos G. Cureus. PubMed Psicothema 2013, 25: 151157. 5 0 obj 0000076441 00000 n A construct is not restricted to one set of observable indicators or attributes and additional indicators will need to be considered in future research. Patient reported outcome measures in trials, Editorial. Keywords: 0000158549 00000 n 0000079670 00000 n 4 0 obj The QuickDASH-Sp was also completed by all participants but there were excessive levels of missing responses that unfortunately rendered the data not useable for analysis and reporting in this study. Similarly, the practical characteristics were not determined. Cite this article. 10.1157/13093053. The UEFI is able to distinguish improved patients from stable patients (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.94) with a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specicity of 0.92, and 10.1197/j.jht.2006.04.001, Gabel CP, Michener LA, Melloh M, Burkett B: Modification of the Upper Limb Functional Index to a Three-point Response Improves Clinimetric Properties. The 15-item LEFS-Ar demonstrated evidence supporting its internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity as a measure of lower extremity function in Arabic-speaking patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Though various region specific PROs have been used to assess upper-limb functional status, it is accepted that there is no gold standard [8, 1012]. Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G. Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study.To perform a comprehensive psychometric analysis of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) to examine its properties and provide insights for an improved . Davis, L.E. This study concluded that the longitudinal validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index was superior to the Upper Extremity Functional Scale. A two stage observational study was conducted involving: initial translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the ULFI [7] to Spanish; then subsequent prospective concurrent completion with a general health questionnaire, the Euroqol Health Questionnaire 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-3L) [41] and an upper limb regional criterion, the QuickDASH-Sp [42].

Steelcase Chairs Refurbished, How Far Is Moscow From Ukraine Border In Miles, Facts About Rookeries, Articles U